http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/electoral-chaos-in-wisconsin.html?ref=opinion In this article, the author writes that a new controversial voter identification law has been put in place in Wisconsin, forcing voters to bring government issued ID’s on Election Day. While this seems like a good decision, statistics state otherwise. The main issue that this law fights is voter impersonation. This issue is nearly non-existent. To make matters worse, thousands of the low-income residents of Wisconsin that do not have government issued ID’s will be deterred from going through the process needed to vote. Two months shy of Election Day, this is a serious problem.
I agree with Josh, this is a serious problem. Who has promted the idea that voter impersonation is a problem? Sadly this is a tactic to deter low income citizen from voting. This is also effecting other areas of the country. Hopefully people will be aware of the voter ID laws and prevent/ retract then from being in effect.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/to-crush-isis-make-a-deal-with-assad-.html In this article, the author writes that the only way the United States is going to be effective in the war on ISIS, is to align with the Assad regime in Syria. I disagree. The U.S. has been clear that they do not condone the violent actions of Assad’s government in Syria during their bloody civil war. After various economic sanctions, The U.S. would be sending the wrong message to the world if they suddenly teamed up with Assad.
I also disagree with the author. Although, I think they want more involvement in the war against ISIS, this is not the way to. The U.S. does not need to get involved with the Assad regime is Syria, they have a lot going on already. And if we did align with the regime, it would just be another reason for people for the U.S. to intervene in Syria, and we don't need that. Also, if the U.S. has already made it clear that they don't condone then violence, then this alignment wouldn't really make sense, like Josh said, it would send the wrong message.
I agree with Josh on this. Obama is hoping for some kind of alliance between these nations and ours but yet in his announcement to the United States he clearly stated that is was Syria's job and the nations around it to solve the ISIS problem. Also teaming up with Assad is going to set a bad example for America and that we do condone violence and that we agree with it. We need to set a example for America saying that we do not agree with this.
America needs to be able to trust Iraq. We have had problems with them in the past but I believe it is in our best interests to put those issues aside and come to a agreement. We need to be able to trust the new government Iraq has and possibly be able to depend on them and possibly have them as a allie in the near or present future for the good of both nations.
i agree with this. america should cut off all strings attached to the past with Iraq and such and just let them evolve their government. right now although their government is making progress, it still isn't efficient enough to sustain itself strongly and balanced. the U.S. can not trust them at the moment but i think in the future they could, and will have a very good connect with Iraq.
This Article is about how Scotland and England are splitting up. They are putting to a vote and the polls show it to be split down the middle. They also predict a 90% voter turnout, which would a great representation or the population. I would like to see how this turns out. I have no opinion if they separate or not. The two have somewhat different cultures, values,accents. If Scotland separates, it would be breaking a tie for over 300 years.
Scotland and England wanting to be an independant country doesn't harm me in any way, however the fact that the votes are split down the middle bring up a larger topic. If Scotland does become independant from England about half of the population will be angry, and visa versa. I personally think that a group of people will try to say the country became independent purely because voters wanted to break the tie, just like when Obama became President, and people said he gained votes because he was African American and we had never had an African American president. I'm curious as to how they will decide whether or not to become independent since half of their society agrees, while the other half disagrees.
I agree. Scotland and England splitting up wont really affect me or a lot of people. The people in those areas might have some strong opinions on that. Becoming independent could help these territories learn new skills. This could potentially cause conflict between these two. The fact that they had two different somewhat cultures, values, and accents is a good thing, you're teaching others about stuff they didn't know before.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/18/world/europe/scotland-independence-vote/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 i found it quite shocking that the majority in scotland in a couple of the districts in scotland (clackmannanshire) had chosen they prefer to stay in the United kingdom. over 54% in just four of the districts have chosen to stay in the union. although the final tally up has not been announced yet. i find it quite interesting of how this will turn out if scotland actually removes itself from the UK, and becomes independent.
The author of this editorial thinks that Congress should strengthen the federal agency responsible for investigating auto defects and I agree. Regulators failed to identify an ignition defect in millions of G.M. cars that's been linked to at least 19 deaths. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration failed to investigate further when presented with information that should have led to an immediate investigation. They claimed that there wasn't enough evidence presented. I find this very alarming. This effects the people directly and I think that Congress should definitely do something about it. Especially since it's been linked to 19 deaths.
I think that it is pitiful that companies care this little about the quality of their products that we trust out lives to every single day. But I don't think that the government needs to do something about it. There shouldn't be government regulations on every thing we do. If they want to put out a crappy product let them. It is up to us as customers to make the decision to not purchase products from companies with bad reputations.
I would definitely blame the companies not the Government. GMC should have gotten a greater punishment for this. My car is one of the cars with a defect and I get scared every day when I drive knowing that they don't have enough resources to fix all of these cars. People died from this and they arent even going to find a way to fix this? A letter in the mail didnt solve this in my eyes. Some companies need to learn responsibilities instead of trying to get the cars out ASAP so that they can make their money.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/davis-expands-lead-over-brownback-in-election-for-kansas-governor/article/2553510 This is just a small example of what midterm elections are looking like. I think this article shows the harsh side to campaigning, that people go to extreme lengths just for those couple extra supporters. When I read that the tweets Sam Brownback posted of Paul Davis may of been the reason of his set back, it reminded me of the maxim Spin! Because Paul Davis took what Brownback said of him and turned it around to make Brownback look shallow, and now Davis is in the lead 38-42.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/a-chance-to-go-from-hard-lives-to-healing/?_php=true&_type=blogs&ref=opinion&_r=0 This EMS corps group I imagine will set off just as the programs in New York did. Its inspiring that there are foundations that want to reach out and help others who have potential but no motivation. This could lead to many more health centers joining in to stop the violence and number of gang fights that go on from people who need help. To some people the lack of years these students are given to get the full education in this field may be alarming, and from the incident from the firefighters, I could understand. Although society should look at the big picture. This program is specifically reaching out to the poverty, the homeless and giving opportunities as well as possible careers to people who wouldn't of had a chance before.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/opinion/refugees-fleeing-to-europe-face-death-from-smugglers.html Smugglers killing refugees I think that it is very sad that people are so sick in this world. These people put their lives in the hand of theses smugglers to get out of their very violent and dangerous countries and the smugglers just watch them die and laugh about it. However, I do question the judgment of these people. It sounds to me as though crossing the Mediterranean Sea with smugglers might be a little more dangerous than the country you came from. I have a novel idea... QUIT CROSSING THE BOARDERS ILAGALLY. Problem solved.
I agree with Jonathan to an extent here. What the smugglers are doing is sick and deplorable. Although I wouldn't question the judgement of the refugees in this situation. They are crossing the Mediterranean alone with smugglers but their home country is obviously bad enough to make this a viable option. When a situation is dire the crazy becomes reasonable. As far as crossing borders legally goes... Well, that's easier said than done.
In Scotland the voting age is now 16 instead of 18. In this article it states that most everyone thought this law would help the independence campaign. Jan Eichhorn then says that they were wrong because the population for the ages 16-17 only affects about three percent of the votes. I think this law was poorly thought out. England does have a higher learning system, however these people are still kids in high school. Being in high school I wouldn't want the option to vote because personally I don't feel that I understand politics enough to participate in something that has the potential to change a country.
I think that them making the voting age 16 not being the best decision as well. I agree that people under 18 may not fully understand politics. So this may cause problems for them because even though they are only about 3% of the votes it will still affect it. Also some people that age have a care free attitude so this may cause them to vote for who ever and not even care about the outcome of that decision. They are still in school and I believe they should get a bit more of an education and then they should be able to vote. This is because when they are better educated they'll most likely make a better choice so it would be a more thought out vote rather than now where they'd most likely vote for whatever making a possible bad outcome for the country.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/opinion/when-medicine-is-futile.html?ref=opinion&_r=0 This Opinion Editorial is very personal to the writer and I thought it was very interesting. It's about the writers father who passed away. He a doctor who was obsessed with hating the idea that doctors keep patients who are ready to pass away on tubes and keeping their last moments in the hospital. The writer says that "My father carried his near-obsession with medical futility to questionable extremes. Once, he even covered a newly dead patient — who had been hospitalized for months and was in constant agony — with his own body, to stop his colleagues from trying to revive her." although the author and his father were very extreme, I still agree that someones last moments shouldn't feel miserable.
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/views_on_countriesregions_bt/345.php?lb=btvoc in this opinion editorial they discuss how the US tries to play the rule of "policeman." They also discuss how the rest of the world agrees and thinks that the united states should have less bases around the world, along with less troops overseas. It shows graphs of counties votes on weather they think the US should stay as the policeman, do its part with other counties, or withdraw from all its military presence around the world. I think that the US should have a presence around the world because what we do overseas could save us in the long run. Us stopping what we are doing overseas could come back and have an uncountable amount of negative outcomes that we couldn't imagine at the moment.
I personal disagree that the united states should keep its position as the worlds policemen. We honestly need to pick if we want to be involved in foreign affairs or not. Almost all the counties in the surveys thought we should have less military basses and if we want to be the worlds policemen we should reduce the number of bases we have. If we want to man up and take charge we could make the better place. That is the only reason we should keep that many bases around the world. Hoverer despite this who of military force most of the olds believes that were good and can be trusted.
This article is about the vote on the issue of splitting Scotland from the rest of Britain Britain. The writer seems to side with the independence movement and is almost surprised that they lost. He mentions how while those in favor of independence were more vocal and visible the quiet and cautious union advocates were simply more numerous. The union has a lot of benefits for Scotland and is not just a baseless rule. It would cause major problems for both countries if they were to split such as the relocation of nuclear submarines and the establishment of a new currency in Scotland. All in all for now it is more beneficial for the two countries to remain united instead of standing apart.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/roger-cohen-we-the-people-of-scotland.html?ref=opinion&_r=0 This article is really interesting because Scotland tried to secede from Britain. Instead of duking it out like we did with the British the scots left it up to the peoples vote. Britain also agreed that if there was a more than 50% for splitting that they would not pursue military action. However it failed with only 40% of scots saying yes to independence. This is a great example how democracy solved a world issue without unnecessary violence. I am glad that the vote failed however because it would cause massive instability in England.
This article talks about how there's a controversy in Wisconsin about officials there wanting to ask for a picture id to be able to vote. In my opinion this isn't a big deal to just show up and show an id. Although a person from the article proved a good point I'm saying that some of the poor or minority voters may not have the id they are asking for. And because of this I think if they do end up doing this they should accept many forms of id. Although one thing I thought wasn't fair is it stairs that the absentee votes won't be counted for even though they are very popular. I think that's unnecessary because those people asked for that before they wanted to do that so they shouldn't have to not be counted. They believe an estimated 300,000 people don't have the proper id so I think this is to problematic in that case. In conclusion this article is about people in Wisconsin might need an id to vote.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html This article is about climate change and global warming. The writer says that replanting trees is a myth to solve global warming. I personally think that it may not do a lot but I think it could do a little to save the environment. One thing that would really help would be to select the trees like only tell the big healthy trees and plant new ones in there place so you don't completely destroy the biome area. Because if you clear cut the whole area the soil dries up and becomes un reusable and could kill off that whole area and strip wild animals of there homes. So replanting trees in an area that was clear cut may not help a lot but replanting trees in a selective cut area may help a lot more. That's how I feel about this topic of the article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/electoral-chaos-in-wisconsin.html?ref=opinion
ReplyDeleteIn this article, the author writes that a new controversial voter identification law has been put in place in Wisconsin, forcing voters to bring government issued ID’s on Election Day. While this seems like a good decision, statistics state otherwise. The main issue that this law fights is voter impersonation. This issue is nearly non-existent. To make matters worse, thousands of the low-income residents of Wisconsin that do not have government issued ID’s will be deterred from going through the process needed to vote. Two months shy of Election Day, this is a serious problem.
I agree with Josh, this is a serious problem. Who has promted the idea that voter impersonation is a problem? Sadly this is a tactic to deter low income citizen from voting. This is also effecting other areas of the country. Hopefully people will be aware of the voter ID laws and prevent/ retract then from being in effect.
Deletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/16/opinion/to-crush-isis-make-a-deal-with-assad-.html
ReplyDeleteIn this article, the author writes that the only way the United States is going to be effective in the war on ISIS, is to align with the Assad regime in Syria. I disagree. The U.S. has been clear that they do not condone the violent actions of Assad’s government in Syria during their bloody civil war. After various economic sanctions, The U.S. would be sending the wrong message to the world if they suddenly teamed up with Assad.
I also disagree with the author. Although, I think they want more involvement in the war against ISIS, this is not the way to. The U.S. does not need to get involved with the Assad regime is Syria, they have a lot going on already. And if we did align with the regime, it would just be another reason for people for the U.S. to intervene in Syria, and we don't need that. Also, if the U.S. has already made it clear that they don't condone then violence, then this alignment wouldn't really make sense, like Josh said, it would send the wrong message.
DeleteI agree with Josh on this. Obama is hoping for some kind of alliance between these nations and ours but yet in his announcement to the United States he clearly stated that is was Syria's job and the nations around it to solve the ISIS problem. Also teaming up with Assad is going to set a bad example for America and that we do condone violence and that we agree with it. We need to set a example for America saying that we do not agree with this.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/opinion/can-the-us-count-on-the-new-government-in-baghdad.html?ref=opinion
ReplyDeleteAmerica needs to be able to trust Iraq. We have had problems with them in the past but I believe it is in our best interests to put those issues aside and come to a agreement. We need to be able to trust the new government Iraq has and possibly be able to depend on them and possibly have them as a allie in the near or present future for the good of both nations.
i agree with this. america should cut off all strings attached to the past with Iraq and such and just let them evolve their government. right now although their government is making progress, it still isn't efficient enough to sustain itself strongly and balanced. the U.S. can not trust them at the moment but i think in the future they could, and will have a very good connect with Iraq.
Deletehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/world/scots-turn-out-to-vote-in-independence-referendum/2014/09/18/85cf9278-5c90-4cbb-ab29-4f4c0d4ef949_story.html?tid=HP_lede
ReplyDeleteThis Article is about how
Scotland and England are splitting up. They are putting to a vote and the polls show it to be split down the middle. They also predict a 90% voter turnout, which would a great representation or the population. I would like to see how this turns out. I have no opinion if they separate or not. The two have somewhat different cultures, values,accents. If Scotland separates, it would be breaking a tie for over 300 years.
Scotland and England wanting to be an independant country doesn't harm me in any way, however the fact that the votes are split down the middle bring up a larger topic. If Scotland does become independant from England about half of the population will be angry, and visa versa. I personally think that a group of people will try to say the country became independent purely because voters wanted to break the tie, just like when Obama became President, and people said he gained votes because he was African American and we had never had an African American president. I'm curious as to how they will decide whether or not to become independent since half of their society agrees, while the other half disagrees.
DeleteI agree. Scotland and England splitting up wont really affect me or a lot of people. The people in those areas might have some strong opinions on that. Becoming independent could help these territories learn new skills. This could potentially cause conflict between these two. The fact that they had two different somewhat cultures, values, and accents is a good thing, you're teaching others about stuff they didn't know before.
Deletehttp://www.cnn.com/2014/09/18/world/europe/scotland-independence-vote/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
ReplyDeletei found it quite shocking that the majority in scotland in a couple of the districts in scotland (clackmannanshire) had chosen they prefer to stay in the United kingdom. over 54% in just four of the districts have chosen to stay in the union. although the final tally up has not been announced yet. i find it quite interesting of how this will turn out if scotland actually removes itself from the UK, and becomes independent.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/opinion/avoiding-the-next-auto-safety-failure.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0
ReplyDeleteThe author of this editorial thinks that Congress should strengthen the federal agency responsible for investigating auto defects and I agree. Regulators failed to identify an ignition defect in millions of G.M. cars that's been linked to at least 19 deaths. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration failed to investigate further when presented with information that should have led to an immediate investigation. They claimed that there wasn't enough evidence presented. I find this very alarming. This effects the people directly and I think that Congress should definitely do something about it. Especially since it's been linked to 19 deaths.
I think that it is pitiful that companies care this little about the quality of their products that we trust out lives to every single day. But I don't think that the government needs to do something about it. There shouldn't be government regulations on every thing we do. If they want to put out a crappy product let them. It is up to us as customers to make the decision to not purchase products from companies with bad reputations.
DeleteI would definitely blame the companies not the Government. GMC should have gotten a greater punishment for this. My car is one of the cars with a defect and I get scared every day when I drive knowing that they don't have enough resources to fix all of these cars. People died from this and they arent even going to find a way to fix this? A letter in the mail didnt solve this in my eyes. Some companies need to learn responsibilities instead of trying to get the cars out ASAP so that they can make their money.
Deletehttp://washingtonexaminer.com/davis-expands-lead-over-brownback-in-election-for-kansas-governor/article/2553510
ReplyDeleteThis is just a small example of what midterm elections are looking like. I think this article shows the harsh side to campaigning, that people go to extreme lengths just for those couple extra supporters. When I read that the tweets Sam Brownback posted of Paul Davis may of been the reason of his set back, it reminded me of the maxim Spin! Because Paul Davis took what Brownback said of him and turned it around to make Brownback look shallow, and now Davis is in the lead 38-42.
http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/a-chance-to-go-from-hard-lives-to-healing/?_php=true&_type=blogs&ref=opinion&_r=0
ReplyDeleteThis EMS corps group I imagine will set off just as the programs in New York did. Its inspiring that there are foundations that want to reach out and help others who have potential but no motivation. This could lead to many more health centers joining in to stop the violence and number of gang fights that go on from people who need help. To some people the lack of years these students are given to get the full education in this field may be alarming, and from the incident from the firefighters, I could understand. Although society should look at the big picture. This program is specifically reaching out to the poverty, the homeless and giving opportunities as well as possible careers to people who wouldn't of had a chance before.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/opinion/refugees-fleeing-to-europe-face-death-from-smugglers.html
ReplyDeleteSmugglers killing refugees
I think that it is very sad that people are so sick in this world. These people put their lives in the hand of theses smugglers to get out of their very violent and dangerous countries and the smugglers just watch them die and laugh about it. However, I do question the judgment of these people. It sounds to me as though crossing the Mediterranean Sea with smugglers might be a little more dangerous than the country you came from. I have a novel idea... QUIT CROSSING THE BOARDERS ILAGALLY. Problem solved.
I agree with Jonathan to an extent here. What the smugglers are doing is sick and deplorable. Although I wouldn't question the judgement of the refugees in this situation. They are crossing the Mediterranean alone with smugglers but their home country is obviously bad enough to make this a viable option. When a situation is dire the crazy becomes reasonable. As far as crossing borders legally goes... Well, that's easier said than done.
Deletehttp://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2014/09/17/349085178/for-scotlands-16-year-olds-the-first-vote-will-be-on-independence
ReplyDeleteIn Scotland the voting age is now 16 instead of 18. In this article it states that most everyone thought this law would help the independence campaign. Jan Eichhorn then says that they were wrong because the population for the ages 16-17 only affects about three percent of the votes. I think this law was poorly thought out. England does have a higher learning system, however these people are still kids in high school. Being in high school I wouldn't want the option to vote because personally I don't feel that I understand politics enough to participate in something that has the potential to change a country.
I think that them making the voting age 16 not being the best decision as well. I agree that people under 18 may not fully understand politics. So this may cause problems for them because even though they are only about 3% of the votes it will still affect it. Also some people that age have a care free attitude so this may cause them to vote for who ever and not even care about the outcome of that decision. They are still in school and I believe they should get a bit more of an education and then they should be able to vote. This is because when they are better educated they'll most likely make a better choice so it would be a more thought out vote rather than now where they'd most likely vote for whatever making a possible bad outcome for the country.
Deletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/opinion/when-medicine-is-futile.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
ReplyDeleteThis Opinion Editorial is very personal to the writer and I thought it was very interesting. It's about the writers father who passed away. He a doctor who was obsessed with hating the idea that doctors keep patients who are ready to pass away on tubes and keeping their last moments in the hospital. The writer says that "My father carried his near-obsession with medical futility to questionable extremes. Once, he even covered a newly dead patient — who had been hospitalized for months and was in constant agony — with his own body, to stop his colleagues from trying to revive her." although the author and his father were very extreme, I still agree that someones last moments shouldn't feel miserable.
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/views_on_countriesregions_bt/345.php?lb=btvoc
ReplyDeletein this opinion editorial they discuss how the US tries to play the rule of "policeman." They also discuss how the rest of the world agrees and thinks that the united states should have less bases around the world, along with less troops overseas. It shows graphs of counties votes on weather they think the US should stay as the policeman, do its part with other counties, or withdraw from all its military presence around the world. I think that the US should have a presence around the world because what we do overseas could save us in the long run. Us stopping what we are doing overseas could come back and have an uncountable amount of negative outcomes that we couldn't imagine at the moment.
I personal disagree that the united states should keep its position as the worlds policemen. We honestly need to pick if we want to be involved in foreign affairs or not. Almost all the counties in the surveys thought we should have less military basses and if we want to be the worlds policemen we should reduce the number of bases we have. If we want to man up and take charge we could make the better place. That is the only reason we should keep that many bases around the world. Hoverer despite this who of military force most of the olds believes that were good and can be trusted.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/scotlands-pro-unity-vote.html?ref=opinion
ReplyDeleteThis article is about the vote on the issue of splitting Scotland from the rest of Britain Britain. The writer seems to side with the independence movement and is almost surprised that they lost. He mentions how while those in favor of independence were more vocal and visible the quiet and cautious union advocates were simply more numerous. The union has a lot of benefits for Scotland and is not just a baseless rule. It would cause major problems for both countries if they were to split such as the relocation of nuclear submarines and the establishment of a new currency in Scotland. All in all for now it is more beneficial for the two countries to remain united instead of standing apart.
lets point out we used the same article and posted our responses within a min of each other.
Deletehttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/roger-cohen-we-the-people-of-scotland.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
ReplyDeleteThis article is really interesting because Scotland tried to secede from Britain. Instead of duking it out like we did with the British the scots left it up to the peoples vote. Britain also agreed that if there was a more than 50% for splitting that they would not pursue military action. However it failed with only 40% of scots saying yes to independence. This is a great example how democracy solved a world issue without unnecessary violence. I am glad that the vote failed however because it would cause massive instability in England.
http://www.npr.org/2014/09/18/349464158/wis-court-reinstates-voter-id-law-causes-chaos-before-election
ReplyDeleteThis article talks about how there's a controversy in Wisconsin about officials there wanting to ask for a picture id to be able to vote. In my opinion this isn't a big deal to just show up and show an id. Although a person from the article proved a good point I'm saying that some of the poor or minority voters may not have the id they are asking for. And because of this I think if they do end up doing this they should accept many forms of id. Although one thing I thought wasn't fair is it stairs that the absentee votes won't be counted for even though they are very popular. I think that's unnecessary because those people asked for that before they wanted to do that so they shouldn't have to not be counted. They believe an estimated 300,000 people don't have the proper id so I think this is to problematic in that case. In conclusion this article is about people in Wisconsin might need an id to vote.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html
ReplyDeleteThis article is about climate change and global warming. The writer says that replanting trees is a myth to solve global warming. I personally think that it may not do a lot but I think it could do a little to save the environment. One thing that would really help would be to select the trees like only tell the big healthy trees and plant new ones in there place so you don't completely destroy the biome area. Because if you clear cut the whole area the soil dries up and becomes un reusable and could kill off that whole area and strip wild animals of there homes. So replanting trees in an area that was clear cut may not help a lot but replanting trees in a selective cut area may help a lot more. That's how I feel about this topic of the article.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete